Launches are won or lost on market access. Pricing, coverage, channel, and coding decisions all get made years before a market access leader is ever in the room. I have led the market access strategy behind product launches in six therapeutic areas, three of which became blockbusters, and I now bring that judgment to companies on a fractional or interim basis.
Pharmaceutical, biotech, and drug-device combination product companies — whether that's 12–36 months from launch, or a seat that's open right now.
Book a 25-minute call →Three situations this practice was built to solve.
Market access work doesn't pause just because the seat is empty, or because no one has hired into the role yet. The position may have never existed, may have sat unfilled, or may have come open unexpectedly mid-launch. Either way, the only way to get senior market access judgment has usually been to have someone actually in the role, and the gap is what costs companies.
None of it is recoverable later. A fractional arrangement costs a fraction of a fully loaded executive, and closes an open seat far faster than a search would — either way, closing the gap almost always costs less than leaving it open.
These are the areas market access is responsible for in a launch. I can take on all of them, or only the ones you are not already covering.
Payer value proposition, coverage precedent and utilization management benchmarks, indication sequencing, evidence planning, and the milestone plan from pre-approval engagement through first fill.
Price corridor development, gross-to-net architecture and stress testing, rebate and contracting strategy, government pricing exposure, and pricing governance.
Coding, coverage and payment treated as three separate decisions. Category I and III pathways, Medicare contractor coverage, site-of-care economics, and products with no established benefit category.
Specialty pharmacy and distribution network design, buy-and-bill, patient support hub build and vendor selection, affordability programs, and provider reimbursement support.
Standing up the market access function: role definition and hiring profiles, vendor selection and oversight, board and executive reporting, and handover to the permanent hire.
Primary research with current medical and pharmacy directors, competitive market access monitoring, and reimbursement training for field and commercial teams.
A fixed-scope review of your pricing assumptions, likely coverage, and evidence gaps — ending in a ranked list of what could go wrong and a ninety-day plan. Most engagements begin here.
I hold the market access seat: strategy, payer and pricing decisions, vendor oversight, and reporting into whoever owns commercialization or market access.
Near-full-time coverage of an open market access role — through a launch, a leadership gap, or a sudden vacancy — until the permanent hire is in place.
Pharmacy benefit, medical benefit, and the channel underneath both. Most market access careers cover one of the three.
Four ultra-orphan therapies, two of them priced among the highest in the U.S. market — no comparator and no precedent to lean on.
New-to-market launches across six therapeutic areas, three of which reached blockbuster status. Oral and infused, both benefits.
Ophthalmic and combination products, plus pre-approval market access strategy for a Class I Software as a Medical Device.
First-ever patient support hubs built at two manufacturers, alongside specialty pharmacy and direct distribution networks.
More than twenty-five years across large pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device manufacturers — entirely on the manufacturer side. I have owned this strategy from inside companies rather than advising on it from outside, so what I recommend is something a company can actually approve, fund and execute.
Launch figures reflect products supported in senior market access roles at pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device manufacturers.
Before booking a call, this is usually what people want to know.
Both — that's the range I built this practice around. I've stood up market access strategy from scratch at emerging companies, and led it inside large, matrixed pharma organizations. What changes is the engagement model, not the fit: Assessment or Ongoing Leadership for a company building the function for the first time, Interim Cover for a larger organization filling a gap mid-stream — either way, it's built to sit inside whatever structure already exists, including your current vendors and agency partners.
No. I take one active client per therapeutic area or mechanism of action at a time, with NDA and exclusivity terms set at the contract level before an engagement begins.
Pricing follows scope and time commitment. The Assessment is a fixed fee based on your asset pipeline. Ongoing Leadership and Interim Cover run on a monthly retainer or day rate, scoped and agreed before work starts.
Based in the Chicago area, working remotely as a default. On-site travel — for board presentations, launch weeks, or key payer strategy sessions — can be built into the statement of work.
You engage me directly as an independent consultant — a statement of work and an invoiced fee, not a headcount addition. For organizations managing a hiring freeze or an approval delay, that typically makes it a consulting expense rather than an FTE hire.
Yes. Not every engagement means an open seat. Some companies bring me in because I've already run a launch like theirs — a particular modality, a rare disease indication, a device with no established benefit category — and want that experience applied to their specific asset, working alongside the team already in place rather than in place of anyone.
Whether you're building the market access function for the first time, filling an open seat, or want a second opinion on a specific launch, I am glad to talk it through — three ways to reach me:
Bill Engro, Founder & Principal